Strategic Metals: 8 Proven Rare Earth Investments Powering the Next Decade of Extraordinary Gains
Strategic metals are quietly redefining global power, and according to industry insiders, a 10-year window for private investors may already be open.
Key Takeaways
- Understand why strategic metals, specifically eight identified by industry supplier Lewis O’Connor, sit at the intersection of geopolitical power, technology demand, and critical supply concentration risk.
- Explore the four core characteristics that determine whether a strategic metal is relevant as a physical asset for private investors seeking portfolio diversification.
- Learn how supply inelasticity in strategic metals creates periodic, scarcity-driven price movements that informed observers have historically monitored for potential exit signals.
- Discover why working exclusively with established industry suppliers, not attempting to source strategic metals independently, is considered essential by professionals operating in this space.
- Consider how the broader geopolitical competition between the US and China over strategic metals may be reshaping commodity cycles, trade policy, and long-term industrial planning across every major economy.
Strategic Metals and the Hidden Market Controlling Modern Industry
Single metal appears across semiconductors, aviation, energy, and defense simultaneously
Dominant processing controlled by a single nation (e.g., China refines 98% of global gallium)
Among the least available metals in exploitable form on earth
Sustained, growing end-market demand driven by structural technological forces
Framework: Lewis O’Connor, Strategic Metals Invest
Strategic metals represent a category of raw materials so embedded in global manufacturing that nearly every nation’s economic prosperity and military capability depends on them. According to Lewis O’Connor, founder and CEO of Strategic Metals Invest, a commodities dealer moving over 250 metric tons of strategic metals annually across 74 countries, this is not an academic classification but a practical reality shaping 21st-century industry. O’Connor explains that strategic metals are best understood as the upstream raw materials that ultimately become trillions of dollars in downstream GDP.
The US Geological Survey identifies approximately 40 materials classified as critical, but not all of them qualify as relevant physical assets for investors, according to O’Connor. Strategic metals earn that designation only when they meet specific criteria related to rarity, demand concentration, supply risk, and cross-industry application. Understanding which metals clear that bar, and which do not, is the foundational step for anyone seeking to engage with this market as an educational exercise or investment inquiry.
O’Connor draws a sharp distinction between the broader universe of critical materials and the narrow subset of strategic metals that genuinely function as physical assets. Some metals on the critical list are as common as copper in the ground, making them irrelevant from a scarcity standpoint. The strategic metals conversation, as framed in this episode, centers on the eight that meet all four qualifying characteristics simultaneously.
Strategic Metals: The 4 Characteristics That Define a Physical Asset
Strategic metals qualify as relevant physical assets only when they satisfy a four-part framework developed through decades of industrial supply chain experience, according to O’Connor. The first characteristic is cross-industry diversification, meaning a single strategic metal like gallium appears in semiconductors, aviation, energy transition technology, and defense applications simultaneously. Owning one strategic metal, in this framework, provides exposure to multiple industries rather than a single sector.
The second characteristic is supply concentration risk, which O’Connor describes as one of the most consequential factors in the strategic metals market today. Using gallium as a case study, he notes that while China produces approximately 50% of the world’s raw gallium, it is responsible for processing 98% of the refined, usable material. All of North America is currently dependent on China for processed gallium, a dependency that has direct implications for trade policy, tariff negotiations, and military preparedness.
The third characteristic is absolute rarity, specifically which strategic metals are the least available in exploitable form. The fourth is demand trajectory, meaning which strategic metals face the most sustained and growing end-market demand. O’Connor explains that these four characteristics, diversification, supply concentration, rarity, and demand, work together to identify the strategic metals most likely to experience meaningful price movement driven by structural market forces rather than speculative momentum. All eight metals he recommends for private investor consideration satisfy all four criteria.
Strategic Metals: The 8 Materials O’Connor Identifies as Most Relevant
| Metal | Category | China Export Status |
|---|---|---|
| Gallium | Technology Metal | Full Restriction |
| Germanium | Technology Metal | Full Restriction |
| Indium | Technology Metal | No Restriction |
| Rhenium | Technology Metal | No Restriction |
| Dysprosium | Rare Earth | Export Licensing |
| Terbium | Rare Earth | Export Licensing |
| Neodymium | Rare Earth | Export Licensing |
| Praseodymium | Rare Earth | Export Licensing |
Framework: Lewis O’Connor, Strategic Metals Invest
Strategic metals break into two categories according to O’Connor’s framework: technology metals and rare earth elements. The four technology metals he identifies as meeting all qualifying criteria are gallium, germanium, indium, and rhenium. The four rare earth elements he recommends from within the broader universe of 17 rare earths are dysprosium, praseodymium, neodymium, and terbium.
Within this group of eight strategic metals, O’Connor draws further distinctions based on current geopolitical conditions. Gallium and germanium are currently subject to full export restrictions from China to the United States, meaning they cannot legally flow from China to American buyers at this time. The four rare earths, dysprosium, neodymium, praseodymium, and terbium, are under export licensing controls, requiring Chinese producers to obtain government approval before exporting, with the Chinese government retaining discretion over which buyers receive product. Rhenium and indium round out the eight strategic metals as high-demand technology materials without equivalent supply restrictions at the time of recording.
O’Connor also notes that two of the eight strategic metals, neodymium and praseodymium, were at or below cost at the time of this episode, following a sustained price decline from 2022 through 2024 that he attributes to a market correction after COVID-era price surges. He presents this not as a signal to avoid them but as context for understanding the cyclical nature of strategic metals pricing. Investors and analysts tracking this market can review pricing data through independent reporting agencies such as Argus Media, Fastmarkets, and Asia Metals.
Strategic Metals and the Structural Supply Problem Driving Price Behavior
Strategic metals do not occur in discrete, mineable deposits the way gold or copper do, and that distinction has profound implications for supply dynamics. O’Connor explains that gallium, for example, is a byproduct of aluminum mining, meaning its supply is structurally tied to aluminum production rather than to gallium demand. Similarly, hafnium is produced as a byproduct of zirconium mining at a ratio of approximately one ton of hafnium per 50 tons of zirconium, making supply expansion virtually impossible to accelerate in response to demand spikes.
This supply inelasticity is what O’Connor identifies as the mechanism behind historical scarcity-driven price events in the strategic metals market. He cites terbium, which rose approximately 500% over two years during the COVID lockdown period as demand for home computers and semiconductors surged while production remained constrained. Hafnium experienced a reported 250% increase over roughly 18 months when aviation demand rebounded following lockdowns, driven by Boeing and Airbus resuming aircraft orders. O’Connor presents these as historical data points, not as predictions or guarantees of future performance, and notes that his firm monitors these conditions to inform suggestions to private investors about potential exit timing.
The broader structural supply problem for strategic metals extends beyond byproduct dependency. O’Connor references comments from the CEO of MP Materials, operator of the Mountain Pass rare earth facility in California, who stated publicly that meeting projected strategic metals demand would require hundreds of additional mines. Each mine represents billions in capital investment, years of permitting, and significant infrastructure buildout. The average time from discovery to production in the US mining sector has been approximately 29 years, according to O’Connor, underscoring why supply cannot respond quickly to demand signals in the strategic metals market. The US Geological Survey’s Critical Minerals program provides publicly available data on these supply concentration risks.
Strategic Metals as Geopolitical Currency in Cold War 2.0
Strategic metals have moved from industrial inputs to instruments of geopolitical use, and O’Connor argues this shift is already underway, not approaching. He frames the current era as Cold War 2.0, where the competition is not an arms race but a semiconductor race, with strategic metals serving as the critical raw material layer beneath it. During World War II, steel determined industrial and military capacity. During the Cold War, nuclear capability defined power. Today, O’Connor argues, precision semiconductor technology and the strategic metals that make it possible have become the equivalent determinants of national strength.
The historical precedent O’Connor offers is instructive for understanding how geopolitical events translate into strategic metals price movements. In 2012, a territorial dispute between China and Japan over a detained fishing vessel prompted China to restrict rare earth exports to Japan. The resulting supply disruption drove significant price increases in the affected strategic metals over a three-to-five-month period. O’Connor presents this as a case study in how political decisions, disconnected from supply and demand fundamentals, can create sudden, sharp price events in the strategic metals market.
He notes that Deng Xiaoping, widely regarded as the architect of modern China, made a prescient statement in 1987 while standing on a rare earth mine: “The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths.” In the decades since, China has consolidated its position in strategic metals processing from approximately 10% of global production to dominant control over refined output. O’Connor observes that the US, Europe, and their partners are now actively working to reduce this dependency, but the metallurgical expertise gap is substantial. China has approximately 400,000 trained metallurgists; North America has roughly 400, according to O’Connor’s estimates. Frameworks for understanding critical mineral supply chain risk are available through the US Department of Energy’s Critical Minerals program.
Strategic Metals Demand and the Coming Super Commodity Cycle
Strategic metals demand is being shaped by forces that O’Connor and other market observers describe as a super commodity cycle, the first of its kind since Asia’s industrialization in the 1970s. The primary drivers O’Connor identifies are artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, automation, energy transition technology including electric vehicles and wind turbines, space exploration, aviation, defense, and the expansion of consumer technology. Each of these sectors depends on the same narrow group of strategic metals, creating overlapping demand curves that are difficult to satisfy from constrained global supply.
O’Connor uses Austria as a concrete illustration of the scale of this strategic metals demand problem. To meet its planned energy transition goals between now and 2030, Austria, a country of approximately nine million people, would require four and a half times the current global production of gallium. He presents this not as a criticism of Austria’s policy goals but as a quantitative illustration of the gap between what nations are planning and what the strategic metals supply chain can realistically deliver. When this dynamic plays out across dozens of nations simultaneously, O’Connor argues, the result is not merely price pressure but potential periods where supply simply does not exist at any price.
O’Connor’s view, shared with the caveat that it represents his firm’s perspective rather than a guarantee, is that the demand trajectory for strategic metals remains robust through at least the 2040s, with particularly acute pressure expected around 2028 as electric vehicle infrastructure and renewable energy installations reach critical scale. Price reporting agencies including Argus Media and Fastmarkets publish independent forecasts for these materials. Investors and analysts seeking to evaluate these projections independently can consult the International Energy Agency’s Critical Minerals analysis, which covers supply and demand projections across the energy transition metal environment.
Strategic Metals: How Private Investors Can Approach This Market Safely
Confirm tier-one industrial supplier status with verifiable manufacturer relationships (e.g., Siemens)
Allocate across all 8 strategic metals to avoid single-metal substitution or supply abundance risk
Metals stored in certified secure facility; direct ownership analogous to physical gold or silver
Monitor geopolitical signals and demand curves for scarcity-driven price events
Exit only through established industrial buyer channels; manufacturers will not buy from unknown counterparties
Framework: Lewis O’Connor, Strategic Metals Invest
Strategic metals participation for private investors is not comparable to buying publicly traded commodities or ETFs, as it involves the physical ownership of industrial-grade materials, with all of the custody, verification, and liquidation complexity that entails. O’Connor is explicit that attempting to participate in the strategic metals market without an established industry supplier is not advisable. The reason is straightforward: the only end buyers for strategic metals are manufacturers, and manufacturers will not purchase materials from unknown counterparties regardless of price or purity claims.
O’Connor’s firm, Strategic Metals Invest, invites private investors to participate in the supply chain by purchasing physical strategic metals that are stored in the company’s vault in Frankfurt, a structure originally built as a World War II bunker operating two levels below ground. Ownership is direct, analogous in structure to owning physical gold or silver. The suggested holding period is a minimum of three to five years, though O’Connor notes that scarcity-driven price events have historically created shorter-term opportunities where the firm may suggest clients consider liquidating positions that have appreciated significantly.
O’Connor’s framework for mitigating downside risk in strategic metals centers on diversification across all eight recommended materials, avoiding any single metal that may face substitution risk or near-term supply abundance, and working exclusively with suppliers who have verifiable, long-standing relationships with industrial buyers. His firm cites its status as a tier-one supplier to companies including Siemens as evidence of supply chain legitimacy, the kind of institutional credentialing he argues private investors must verify before trusting any counterparty with strategic metals custody. The SEC’s investor guidance on commodity investments provides a useful framework for evaluating counterparty risk and due diligence standards in physical commodity transactions.
Strategic Metals and the Signals Serious Investors Are Monitoring Right Now
Strategic metals pricing is influenced by a set of observable signals that sophisticated market participants track continuously, according to O’Connor. The primary signal is demand trajectory, specifically which technologies are scaling, what raw materials those technologies require, and whether supply chains are positioned to meet that demand. AI infrastructure, electric vehicle manufacturing, nuclear energy, and defense procurement are all active demand vectors for the eight strategic metals O’Connor identifies.
The secondary signal is geopolitical action, including trade restrictions, export licensing decisions, tariff escalations, and bilateral agreements that affect the movement of strategic metals across borders. O’Connor notes that during the episode’s recording, President Trump had announced an additional 35% tariff on Chinese goods but notably excluded metals and semiconductors from that action. O’Connor’s interpretation is that the US government may have withheld that escalation specifically because China retains the ability to cut off strategic metals exports entirely, an action that would immediately threaten the entire US technology and defense industrial base.
O’Connor’s overall guidance for observers of the strategic metals market is to watch geopolitical developments as leading indicators of supply disruption and track technology adoption curves as leading indicators of demand. He advises treating current strategic metals pricing as a snapshot within a structural multi-decade shift rather than a terminal data point. He describes 2025 as the beginning of what he calls the year of strategic stockpiling, a period when nation-states and corporations will increasingly attempt to build inventory buffers against future supply constraints in the strategic metals market. Those seeking to follow this market can monitor independent price reporting through Fastmarkets, which covers strategic metals pricing with institutional-grade data.
For Fund Managers Raising $10M to $500M+
The Room You Have Been Trying to Get Into
The fund managers closing institutional LPs are not smarter than you. They are better positioned. Fund Raise Capital works exclusively with alternative asset managers who are serious about building a capital raising machine — not guessing their way through LP conversations.
This is not a course. This is not a community. This is direct access to the frameworks, relationships, and infrastructure used by fund managers operating at the highest levels of the alternative asset industry.
About the Guest
Lewis O’Connor is the founder and CEO of Strategic Metals Invest, a commodities dealer headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany, with offices across Europe. His firm moves over 250 metric tons of strategic rare earth metals annually and serves more than 4,000 clients in 74 countries, operating as a tier-one industrial supplier to major global manufacturers while also providing physical strategic metals access to private investors.
O’Connor operates at the intersection of industrial metals supply chains and private investor education, with his Frankfurt vault, originally a World War II bunker, serving as the custody facility for physical strategic metals holdings. He can be reached directly at louis@strategicmetalsinvest.com or through the firm’s website at strategicmetalsinvest.com, where due diligence materials and investor brochures are available for download.
Questions Answered in This Article
Which rare earth metals will be in highest demand next decade?
The episode identifies eight rare metals positioned for significant demand growth over the next decade, driven by the global energy transition, defense modernization, and advanced manufacturing. Metals tied to electric vehicle batteries, semiconductors, and renewable energy infrastructure are cited as the primary categories drawing institutional attention. The discussion frames these eight as a collective thesis rather than isolated bets, emphasizing portfolio-level thinking for serious allocators.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
What criteria should fund managers use when investing in rare metals?
Fund managers evaluating rare earth metal investments should assess supply chain concentration, geopolitical sourcing risk, and the metal’s criticality to high-growth end markets such as defense, EVs, and clean energy. The episode stresses that understanding where a metal is mined, processed, and refined is as important as understanding its demand profile. Managers who skip supply-side diligence expose their portfolios to disruptions that price models rarely capture in advance.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
How do geopolitical risks affect institutional rare earth metal investments?
Geopolitical risk is treated in the episode as a primary pricing variable for rare earth metals, not a secondary consideration, because dominant production is concentrated in a small number of nations with competing strategic interests. Institutional allocators must account for export controls, trade policy shifts, and military tensions that can constrain supply faster than markets reprice. The episode frames geopolitical exposure as both the core risk and, when managed correctly, a potential source of asymmetric upside for well-positioned funds.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
Which metal will boom the most between now and 2026?
The episode does not single out one metal with a guaranteed price forecast, as doing so would misrepresent the complexity of commodity markets and the range of variables involved. The discussion instead highlights that metals most tightly linked to battery technology and defense electronics carry the strongest near-term demand signals heading into the mid-decade window. Investors are encouraged to weigh structural demand growth against supply bottlenecks rather than rely on short-term price predictions.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
What are the best rare earth stocks to buy right now?
The episode does not provide specific stock recommendations, as individual security selection depends on an investor’s risk profile, time horizon, and regulatory standing. The conversation focuses on the thematic and structural case for rare earth metals as an asset class rather than on individual equity picks. Allocators are advised to consult qualified financial professionals before translating thematic conviction into specific securities positions.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
How should family offices gain exposure to critical rare metals markets?
Family offices are discussed in the episode as natural candidates for rare earth metal exposure given their longer investment horizons and tolerance for illiquidity that characterizes physical commodity and private market structures. Exposure pathways discussed include royalty agreements, direct participation in mining ventures, and funds with dedicated critical materials mandates. The key for family offices is matching the illiquidity profile of the chosen vehicle to their overall liquidity planning across the broader portfolio.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
Are rare earth metals a viable alternative investment for institutional allocators?
Rare earth metals are presented in the episode as a credible alternative investment category for institutional allocators seeking exposure to structural, decade-long demand themes outside of traditional equity and fixed income. The asset class carries distinct risk characteristics including supply concentration, regulatory exposure, and commodity price volatility that require specialized diligence frameworks. Institutions that build internal expertise or partner with experienced managers are better positioned to separate durable opportunity from speculative noise in this sector.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
What demand drivers are accelerating rare metal price forecasts today?
The episode identifies electrification, defense spending, semiconductor manufacturing, and the buildout of clean energy infrastructure as the primary demand drivers accelerating interest in rare earth metals today. These are not cyclical trends but are described as policy-backed, multi-decade structural shifts that create sustained consumption pressure on a limited and geographically concentrated supply base. Allocators who understand the intersection of industrial policy and commodity scarcity are better equipped to assess where rare metal price forecasts carry the most analytical support.
Hear the full breakdown on Making Billions with Ryan Miller — and fund managers ready to implement join the Fund Raise Capital community of fund managers and deal syndicators learning first-hand from Ryan Miller, The Wolf of Alt Street.
Topics Covered in This Article
- Strategic metals: the eight materials Lewis O’Connor identifies as most relevant for private investors
- The four characteristics that determine whether a strategic metal qualifies as a physical asset
- China’s dominant role in strategic metals processing and what export restrictions mean for Western supply chains
- Strategic metals supply inelasticity and how byproduct production creates structural price volatility
- Historical scarcity-driven price events in strategic metals including terbium and hafnium
- The geopolitical competition over strategic metals and its role in Cold War 2.0 dynamics
- Strategic metals demand projections through the 2040s driven by AI, energy transition, and defense
- How private investors can safely participate in the strategic metals supply chain through established industry suppliers
- Key signals, geopolitical and technological, that informed observers monitor in the strategic metals market
- Strategic metals stockpiling trends among nation-states and corporations entering the current supply cycle
Want More Frameworks Like This?
Every episode of Making Billions Podcast delivers institutional-grade capital raising strategy, fund structuring insights, and LP relationship frameworks used by the top 1% of alternative asset managers. If you are ready to take the next step, the team at Fund Raise Capital is standing by.
