Startup Accelerator: 7 Proven Frameworks Elite Fund Managers Use to Build and Scale the Best University Programs
Building a startup accelerator without the right network, thesis, or founder-first culture is one of the most expensive mistakes an emerging fund manager can make.
Key Takeaways
- A startup accelerator requires a pre-existing, engageable network before accepting a single application — LinkedIn connections alone do not constitute a network capable of supporting Founders.
- Understanding how a startup accelerator evaluates teams over traction is essential for fund managers assessing early-stage deal flow at the pre-seed and seed fund stages.
- The Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator model demonstrates that institutional affiliation provides unmatched access to faculty, students, and alumni networks that private programs cannot easily replicate.
- Consider how a purpose-driven culture within a startup accelerator directly influences founder resilience, talent retention, and long-term company performance.
- Fund managers exploring the startup accelerator space should explore the structural model where a dedicated external fund invests in program companies, separating university governance from venture capital activity.
Startup Accelerator Success Starts With Network, Not Capital
People you can actually call who will show up with domain knowledge founders need
Accelerator staff connect the founder who needs something to the person who has it
Ensuring each engagement delivers genuine value — not just an introduction
Deal quality and seed-round readiness that justifies operational investment
Framework: Caroline Winnett, Berkeley Skydeck
Every startup accelerator conversation eventually arrives at the same foundational question: what do you actually have to offer founders that they cannot find elsewhere? According to Caroline Winnett, Executive Director of Berkeley Skydeck, the answer is always the network. In this episode of Making Billions Podcast, she explains that a startup accelerator cannot function without an engageable network of people who possess the knowledge, experience, and willingness to sit down with founders and solve real problems.
Winnett is direct in her assessment: LinkedIn connections do not constitute a network. A startup accelerator requires people you can actually call, people who will show up, and people who bring domain expertise that a founder genuinely needs. Without that foundation, the accelerator becomes a collection of workshops and presentations that cannot substitute for real human engagement.
The service-oriented nature of a startup accelerator is frequently underestimated, according to Winnett. She describes the core function of Berkeley Skydeck in straightforward terms: here is a founder who needs to know something, and here is the person who knows that thing. The accelerator’s job is to facilitate that engagement and ensure it goes well for both parties. That sounds simple, but the operational reality is intensive, manual, and deeply relational.
There are no shortcuts, and no amount of digital content replaces that human connection. For fund managers evaluating whether to build or partner with a startup accelerator, this framing carries significant implications. The SEC’s guidance on early-stage investment consistently reinforces that institutional infrastructure matters when evaluating pre-seed and seed stage opportunities. A startup accelerator that lacks genuine network depth is unlikely to produce the deal quality that justifies the operational investment required to run one.
The Startup Accelerator Advantage of Full University Integration
A startup accelerator connected to a major research university operates on a fundamentally different scale than a privately run program. Winnett makes a careful distinction in this episode: Berkeley Skydeck is not a partner, affiliate, or appendage of UC Berkeley. It is a full program of the university, with staff holding Berkeley email addresses and operating within the institution’s governance structure, and that distinction matters enormously for what the startup accelerator can deliver.
The scale of the Berkeley network supporting this startup accelerator is substantial. Winnett cites 45,000 students, approximately 2,000 faculty members, and nearly 600,000 living alumni worldwide. When a startup accelerator can draw on that breadth of expertise across every conceivable industry and discipline, it can operate in a way that a nine-person staff team at a private program simply cannot replicate.
The university network becomes the startup accelerator’s primary product. This structural reality also explains how Berkeley Skydeck can remain industry agnostic while accepting roughly 20 companies per batch. According to Winnett, the startup accelerator can support a quantum computing company, an enzyme engineering firm, and an enterprise software business simultaneously because somewhere in that 600,000-person alumni network, there is a world-class expert in each of those fields. As Harvard Business Review has noted, institutional networks remain one of the most durable competitive advantages in early-stage innovation ecosystems.
Startup Accelerator Downside Risks Every Fund Manager Must Understand
A startup accelerator carries real operational risk, and Winnett does not minimize those risks in this conversation. Her first warning is directed at anyone who wants to launch one without having the foundational network already in place. Without an engaged network of experts, the startup accelerator has nothing to offer founders that justifies their time and attention, and founders in this market have many options.
The second risk Winnett identifies involves thesis construction. A startup accelerator that defines its focus too narrowly may build deep expertise in one sector but find that its total addressable market of suitable companies is too limited to sustain the program. Conversely, a startup accelerator that tries to go too broad without the network to support that breadth will produce a shallow experience that cannot meet the genuine needs of diverse founders. Winnett notes that Berkeley Skydeck is able to go broad specifically because of the university network, a structural advantage that most private programs do not have access to.
Fund managers considering a startup accelerator partnership or co-investment structure should evaluate these risks carefully. According to Investopedia’s framework for evaluating accelerator programs, the quality of mentorship networks and the specificity of the program thesis are among the most predictive factors for portfolio company outcomes. Winnett’s experience at Berkeley Skydeck reinforces that insight from an operator’s perspective.
The Startup Accelerator Investment Model That Separates Skydeck
| Structural Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Program Operator | UC Berkeley (full university program) |
| Investment Vehicle | Berkeley Skydeck Fund (external VC fund) |
| Investment Per Startup | $200,000 |
| Equity Taken | 7.5% per company |
| Carry Donation | 50% of fund carry donated to UC Berkeley |
| Fund Launch | 2022 |
| Governance Design | VC activity separated from university governance |
Framework: Caroline Winnett, Berkeley Skydeck
One of the most structurally distinctive features of the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator model is how the investment function is separated from the university program itself. Winnett explains that when she joined Skydeck a decade ago, UC Berkeley was not in a position to conduct venture capital investing as an institution. The solution was to identify a fund manager who would launch a fund, the Berkeley Skydeck Fund, to invest in the companies coming through the startup accelerator program.
The Berkeley Skydeck Fund invests $200,000 in each startup for seven and a half percent equity, structured through a formal legal agreement. What makes the startup accelerator model particularly compelling from a mission perspective is the carry arrangement: the fund manager donates half of the fund’s carried interest to UC Berkeley. That means the financial upside of finding the next major technology company flows back into university education funding, creating a purpose-driven alignment between investors, founders, and the institution.
For fund managers exploring how to structure a startup accelerator alongside an investment vehicle, this model offers a useful reference point. The separation of the startup accelerator program from the fund, while maintaining a tight operational relationship, addresses governance concerns that would otherwise complicate a direct university investment mandate. It also creates a clear incentive alignment where the fund manager is motivated to select the highest quality companies for the startup accelerator batch. The Bloomberg analysis of university venture models has highlighted this type of structural innovation as increasingly common among top research institutions.
How the Startup Accelerator Evaluates Founders Over Traction
At the stage where Berkeley Skydeck accepts companies into its startup accelerator program, there is very little objective performance data to analyze. Winnett acknowledges this directly: most companies entering the program have minimal revenue, limited customer development, and no proven market fit. The startup accelerator is making a bet on the team, not the metrics.
The evaluative question Winnett says her team uses is essentially this: given the $200,000 investment, the six-month program, and the full weight of the Berkeley network, can this startup successfully raise a seed round from professional investors? That question requires judgment about founder capability, market potential, and the specific capital raising requirements of the industry, which vary significantly between life science, enterprise software, consumer technology, and deep tech hardware companies.
Winnett also addresses data discipline within the startup accelerator selection process. Berkeley Skydeck attempts to be data-informed while actively guarding against poorly constructed heuristics. The program deliberately avoids pattern-matching to fashionable trends or demographic stereotypes, because the team recognizes that over-relying on superficial signals can systematically exclude strong candidates. This approach to bias management in early-stage investing aligns with frameworks discussed in Harvard Business Review’s research on VC decision-making processes.
Startup Accelerator Priorities in the AI and Deep Tech Era
The startup accelerator environment is being reshaped by artificial intelligence, and Winnett is candid about both the excitement and the analytical discipline required to evaluate it well. In this episode, recorded during the period when DeepSeek’s emergence caused significant volatility in AI-related equities, she describes the current environment as a golden age of opportunity that also demands clear-headed thinking from program operators.
Berkeley Skydeck’s startup accelerator maintains an industry-agnostic intake while sustaining a particular focus on deep tech because of the university’s unique capacity to support it. Winnett identifies chips, robotics, quantum computing, life science, blockchain, fintech, climate technology, and air and space as areas where the startup accelerator has built specialized tracks with dedicated expert networks. These tracks exist not to limit the program’s scope, but to ensure that companies in technically complex domains receive guidance from people who genuinely understand those fields.
Ryan Miller raises the prospect of AI enabling single-founder companies with nine and ten-figure market capitalizations through the deployment of autonomous agents. Winnett engages with that possibility thoughtfully, noting that the current environment rewards founders who can build fast, iterate with customers, and deploy the new AI tooling with genuine technical depth. The startup accelerator’s role in that environment is to accelerate precisely those capabilities and connect founders to the expert networks that help them avoid costly technical or go-to-market errors early. Forbes has documented how AI tooling is compressing the time between ideation and market-ready product across multiple startup accelerator cohorts globally.
Startup Accelerator Culture: Why Purpose Drives Talent Acquisition
A startup accelerator is only as strong as the talent that flows through and around it, both the founders it attracts and the professionals who advise them. Winnett argues that the most important tool for attracting top talent to a startup company is not compensation. It is a compelling, clearly articulated purpose that makes talented people want to abandon high-paying jobs, relocate, or forgo graduate school to join the mission.
Winnett identifies the founder’s primary job in the early stages as fundamentally similar to her own as a startup accelerator director: articulating a vision compelling enough that people will commit to it before there is proof of success. Employees need to believe the work matters before revenue validates it. Customers need to trust the promise before the product is complete. Investors need to fund the vision before the traction exists.
The startup accelerator’s role is to help founders develop and communicate that vision with enough conviction to generate all three forms of commitment simultaneously. Ryan Miller introduces a behavioral study in this episode that illustrates the point clearly. Participants were paid to draw pictures, which were then crumpled and discarded in front of them by the researcher, and even though the financial compensation remained unchanged, participants rapidly lost motivation. Harvard Business Review’s research on meaning and work consistently finds that purpose-driven environments outperform transactional ones on retention metrics.
Startup Accelerator Community Design and the In-Person Imperative
One of the structural commitments that defines the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator is its emphasis on in-person programming. Winnett describes the pandemic period as deeply difficult for the program, not merely logistically, but because the relational fabric that makes the startup accelerator function could not be replicated through video conferencing. The program has returned to a hybrid model, requiring in-person attendance at the start and end of each batch with optional remote participation in the middle.
The reasoning behind this structure is grounded in what Winnett identifies as one of the most important relationships in any startup accelerator cohort: the bonds between founders themselves. A founder building a company through an intense six-month program gains something qualitatively different from a peer community of people facing the same pressures, uncertainties, and breakthroughs. That peer network can be life-changing in ways that workshops and seminars cannot replicate.
The startup accelerator also hosts what it describes as the largest intern fairs on the UC Berkeley campus, bringing approximately 2,000 students into contact with the companies in each cohort. For founders who need to make their first technical hires, that access to Berkeley-vetted talent is one of the most concrete and immediately actionable benefits of the program. Winnett’s recommendation for early hires is practical: try before you buy through contract arrangements, because the quality of the first few hires in a startup company has outsized influence on the quality of every subsequent hire the company can attract. This principle aligns with what The Wall Street Journal has reported on early-stage talent strategy in venture-backed companies.

For Fund Managers Raising $10M to $500M+
The Room You Have Been Trying to Get Into
The fund managers closing institutional capital are not smarter than you. They are better connected. Fund Raise Capital works exclusively with alternative asset managers who are serious about building a repeatable capital raising system — not guessing their way through LP conversations or hoping referrals materialize.
Fund Raise Capital is an exclusive community of fund managers — from $1M to $500M AUM — built around one goal: closing the gap between where you are and where your raise needs to be. Members share the exact frameworks, LP relationships, and operational infrastructure used by managers who are actively closing institutional capital today. This is not a course. This is not a mastermind. This is a working community built to differentiate your raise and compress your timeline to close.
Host, Making Billions Podcast
Founder, Fund Raise Capital
Built for fund managers and capital raisers working in the $10M to $500M+ range.
About the Guest
Caroline Winnett is the Executive Director of Berkeley Skydeck, UC Berkeley’s startup accelerator program. She leads a program that hosts over 200 companies per year and, in 2022, was part of launching the Berkeley Skydeck Fund, a venture capital fund that invests in companies participating in the Skydeck startup accelerator program. She is also a UC Berkeley alumna and a former startup founder herself.
Founders and fund managers interested in applying to or learning more about the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator can visit skydeck.berkeley.edu for application timelines, program details, and batch information. Applications open approximately twice per year, in January and July, for batches beginning in May and November respectively.
Questions Answered in This Article
What is the difference between an incubator and an accelerator?
Berkeley SkyDeck operates as a startup accelerator, meaning it runs companies through a structured six-month program with direct investment, intensive mentorship, and network access aimed at getting startups to a successful seed round. Unlike a passive incubator model, an accelerator requires a committed service mindset from staff who personally match founders with the right experts and resources. Caroline Winnett emphasizes that this work cannot be replaced by workshops or videos because it demands hands-on, individualized attention at every stage.
How does Berkeley SkyDeck select and invest in startup companies?
Berkeley SkyDeck selects approximately 20 startups per accelerator batch, accepting companies from Berkeley, sister UC campuses, and founders from around the world. The central investment thesis is straightforward: given SkyDeck’s $200,000 investment, six-month program, and full Berkeley network, can the team successfully raise a seed round from professional investors. Selection focuses heavily on the founding team’s capabilities and coachability rather than revenue, since most accepted companies are at a very early stage with little or no customer development.
What is the Berkeley acceleration method for early stage startups?
The Berkeley acceleration method centers on connecting founders who need specific knowledge with the exact experts who have it, facilitated through UC Berkeley’s network of 45,000 students, 2,000 faculty, and nearly 600,000 alumni worldwide. The program runs for six months per batch, with two batches launching annually in May and November, and culminates in a demo day where startups typically pursue their first significant pre-seed or seed round. Staff of nine are able to support companies across any industry because the broader Berkeley ecosystem supplies world-class domain experts on demand.
How do you build a venture capital accelerator at a university?
Building a university-backed accelerator requires two foundational assets: a genuinely engageable network and an institutional home that gives that network a compelling reason to participate. Caroline Winnett launched the Berkeley SkyDeck Fund in 2022 as a VC fund investing directly in SkyDeck startups, combining programmatic acceleration with formal capital deployment. She warns that without a pre-existing network of people who can be mobilized around specific founder needs, no amount of content or programming can substitute for that structural advantage.
What equity does Berkeley SkyDeck take from accelerator startups?
Berkeley SkyDeck invests $200,000 into each accepted startup as part of its accelerator program. The episode does not specify the exact equity percentage taken in exchange for that investment. Founders should review current SkyDeck program terms directly, as deal structure details were not disclosed during this conversation.
How can family offices access deal flow from university accelerators?
Family offices can access deal flow from university accelerators by positioning themselves as capital partners at the back end of a program’s cycle, particularly around demo day when cohort companies are actively raising seed rounds. Berkeley SkyDeck’s batch model creates a predictable, twice-yearly pipeline of vetted, program-graduated startups that have already been filtered through rigorous selection and six months of intensive development. Partnering with or monitoring programs tied to research universities provides family offices with proprietary early-stage deal flow that is difficult to source through conventional channels.
Should institutional investors partner with university accelerators for early returns?
Institutional investors considering a partnership with university accelerators should weigh the program’s network depth, selection discipline, and ability to prepare companies for professional capital raises rather than focusing on short-term return timelines. Berkeley SkyDeck’s model is explicitly designed to bring companies from pre-revenue or minimal-revenue stages to seed-readiness within six months, which sets realistic expectations about the investment horizon. The launch of the Berkeley SkyDeck Fund in 2022 signals that structured VC participation alongside an accelerator program is a viable institutional strategy when the underlying program has sufficient scale and deal quality.
What returns do investors get from university-backed accelerator programs?
The episode does not cite specific return figures or fund performance data for Berkeley SkyDeck or its affiliated VC fund. What is discussed is the strategic return thesis: SkyDeck’s access to Berkeley’s talent network, its data-informed but bias-resistant selection process, and its deep-tech and AI focus are designed to produce companies capable of attracting professional capital at the seed stage and beyond. Investors interested in quantitative performance data should request it directly from Berkeley SkyDeck, as early-stage fund metrics are typically not disclosed in public forums.
Topics Covered in This Article
- How to evaluate whether building a startup accelerator is the right strategy for a fund manager
- The startup accelerator network requirements that determine program quality
- Berkeley Skydeck’s startup accelerator structure and university integration model
- How a startup accelerator investment fund can be structured separately from university governance
- Startup accelerator founder selection criteria at the pre-seed and seed stage
- Deep tech and AI sector priorities for a modern startup accelerator
- How purpose-driven culture influences talent acquisition and retention inside a startup accelerator
- In-person community design as a competitive advantage for a startup accelerator
- How the Berkeley Skydeck Fund’s carry donation model aligns investor and institutional interests
- Downside risks fund managers must assess before launching or partnering with a startup accelerator
Startup Accelerator Global Reach and the Cross-Border Founder Opportunity
The startup accelerator model at Berkeley Skydeck is not limited to domestic applicants, and Winnett emphasizes in this episode that the program intentionally draws founders from around the world into each batch. The university’s global alumni base of nearly 600,000 living graduates creates a natural infrastructure for cross-border introductions, customer development conversations, and market entry guidance that a purely domestic startup accelerator cannot replicate.
Winnett notes that each batch includes a deliberate mix of Berkeley founders, founders from UC system campuses, faculty-originated spinouts, and international founders who have no prior Berkeley affiliation but bring exceptional technical depth and market insight. That diversity is not incidental to the startup accelerator design. It reflects a deliberate thesis that the best early-stage companies can emerge from any geography when given access to the right network and capital infrastructure.
For fund managers evaluating global deal flow strategy, the structural accessibility of programs like Berkeley Skydeck illustrates an important point about how a startup accelerator can serve as a geographic aggregation mechanism. Rather than deploying scouts across multiple markets, a fund manager with a strong accelerator relationship gains exposure to internationally sourced companies that have already been filtered through a rigorous selection process. According to Bloomberg’s coverage of global accelerator trends, cross-border startup accelerator programs have become one of the most efficient early-stage deal sourcing channels available to institutional fund managers.
Startup Accelerator Demo Day as a Capital Deployment Signal
The startup accelerator demo day is often described as a graduation event, but Winnett frames it in more precise terms: it is a structured signal to the professional investor community that a cohort of companies has completed an intensive preparation process and is ready to raise a seed round. According to Winnett, companies coming out of the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator are typically targeting their first significant seed or pre-seed round from professional investors at the conclusion of the program.
Fund managers who engage with a startup accelerator at the demo day stage are working with companies that have already been filtered twice, once through the application and selection process, and again through six months of intensive operational and strategic development. That two-stage filtering function is one of the core reasons a high-quality startup accelerator creates value for downstream investors, not just for the founders inside the program. Winnett’s framing of the demo day as a fundraising milestone rather than a showcase event reflects a sophisticated understanding of how investor attention translates into capital commitment.
The startup accelerator’s $200,000 investment at seven and a half percent equity also establishes a reference price that downstream investors can anchor to when conducting their own diligence. According to Investopedia’s explanation of the demo day process, the existence of a prior institutional investment in an accelerator company provides a credible valuation signal that reduces one of the most common sources of friction in early-stage deal negotiations between founders and new investors.
Startup Accelerator Partnerships and What Fund Managers Should Evaluate Before Engaging
A startup accelerator partnership with an external fund is not a passive arrangement, and Winnett’s description of the Berkeley Skydeck Fund structure makes clear that the fund manager role carries genuine responsibilities beyond writing a check. According to Winnett, the fund manager who operates the Berkeley Skydeck Fund serves as an active participant in selecting companies for the startup accelerator program, which creates a direct alignment between investment quality and program quality. A fund manager considering a similar structure should understand that this alignment is a feature, not a complication.
The educational dimension of this startup accelerator model deserves attention from fund managers who are evaluating early-stage venture strategies. The program’s six-month curriculum, expert network activation, intern recruitment pipeline, and peer cohort design all contribute to company development in ways that a check alone cannot achieve. Fund managers who understand the operational mechanics of the startup accelerator gain a structural information advantage over investors who encounter the same companies only at the demo day stage, without the context of how those companies were built and what challenges they overcame.
Winnett’s broader advice in this episode for anyone considering a startup accelerator engagement, whether as an operator, a partner, or an investor, is to approach the evaluation with the same rigor applied to any institutional commitment. The network must exist before the program launches. The thesis must match the resources available to support it. And the service orientation must be genuine, not cosmetic. As the SEC’s educational resources on venture capital reinforce, early-stage investment structures carry unique governance and disclosure considerations that institutional investors should evaluate thoroughly before committing capital to or alongside any startup accelerator program.
Startup Accelerator Institution Building for the Decade Ahead
| Dimension | University Accelerator | Private Accelerator |
|---|---|---|
| Network Depth | 600,000+ alumni, faculty, students | Dependent on individual partner networks |
| Sector Scope | Industry agnostic; deep tech capable | Often thesis-constrained by team expertise |
| Talent Pipeline | On-campus intern fairs; ~2,000 students | External recruitment only |
| Investment Model | External VC fund; carry donation to university | Direct fund or sponsor-backed |
| Long-Term Compounding | Alumni return as mentors and investors | Relationship-dependent; variable |
Framework: Caroline Winnett, Berkeley Skydeck
Winnett has led the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator for approximately a decade, and her perspective on what makes the program durable over time is grounded in institutional thinking rather than cohort-by-cohort optimization. In this episode, she describes the goal not as producing successful individual companies but as building a startup accelerator program that compounds over time, one where alumni founders return as mentors, investors, and advocates, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of network density that strengthens each subsequent batch.
The startup accelerator’s carry donation model, where half of the fund’s carried interest flows back to UC Berkeley, is one mechanism that embeds this long-term orientation into the financial structure of the program. When the financial upside of the best-performing companies in the startup accelerator supports university education directly, the institution has a structural reason to invest in the program’s success across decades rather than quarters. That alignment between the accelerator’s investment performance and the university’s educational mission is a governance design that most private programs cannot replicate without external sponsorship or philanthropic capital.
For fund managers who are thinking seriously about institution building in the early-stage ecosystem, the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator offers a model worth studying in its entirety, not just the investment mechanics, but the cultural infrastructure, the hiring philosophy, the network activation discipline, and the long-term relationship with a university that amplifies every one of those elements. According to Harvard Business Review’s research on institutional longevity, the organizations that compound value over decades consistently share one attribute: a mission that outlasts any individual leader, product, or market cycle. Winnett’s work at Berkeley Skydeck reflects exactly that orientation, and her frameworks represent a substantive educational resource for anyone building at the intersection of venture capital and institutional program design.

For Fund Managers Raising $10M to $500M+
The Room You Have Been Trying to Get Into
The fund managers closing institutional LPs are not smarter than you. They are better positioned. Fund Raise Capital works exclusively with alternative asset managers who are serious about building a capital raising machine — not guessing their way through LP conversations.
Fund Raise Capital is an exclusive community of fund managers — from $1M to $500M AUM — who share the frameworks, relationships, and infrastructure used by managers operating at the highest levels of the alternative asset industry. This is not a course. This is a community built to differentiate your raise.
Host, Making Billions Podcast
Founder, Fund Raise Capital
Built for fund managers and capital raisers working in the $10M to $500M+ range.
About the Guest
Caroline Winnett is the Executive Director of Berkeley Skydeck, UC Berkeley’s startup accelerator program, where she has led operations for approximately a decade. She oversees a program that hosts over 200 companies per year across two annual batches and, in 2022, was part of launching the Berkeley Skydeck Fund, a venture capital fund that invests $200,000 in each startup accepted into the startup accelerator program. She is a UC Berkeley alumna and a former startup founder.
Founders and fund managers interested in learning more about the Berkeley Skydeck startup accelerator can visit skydeck.berkeley.edu for application timelines, program details, and batch information. Applications open approximately twice per year, in January and July, for batches beginning in May and November respectively.
Questions Answered in This Article
What is the difference between an incubator and an accelerator?
Berkeley SkyDeck operates as a startup accelerator, meaning it runs companies through a structured six-month program with direct investment, intensive mentorship, and network access aimed at getting startups to a successful seed round. Unlike a passive incubator model, an accelerator requires a committed service mindset from staff who personally match founders with the right experts and resources. Caroline Winnett emphasizes that this work cannot be replaced by workshops or videos because it demands hands-on, individualized attention at every stage.
How does Berkeley SkyDeck select and invest in startup companies?
Berkeley SkyDeck selects approximately 20 startups per accelerator batch, accepting companies from Berkeley, sister UC campuses, and founders from around the world. The central investment thesis is straightforward: given SkyDeck’s $200
